3 ms·
> "but it's still unclear exactly how they're going to get there." Technology is a good bet. Camera technology as well as cost has come down by orders of magni
by potatolicious 13y ago
> "but it's still unclear exactly how they're going to get there."
Technology is a good bet. Camera technology as well as cost has come down by orders of magnitude in recent years - the Canon 5D Mark II was the turning point (the first DSLR capable of shooting 1080p video at acceptable frame rates), but we're way beyond that now.
And we're not talking about "making cameras cheaper so anyone can throw one on a tripod and make amateur videos", we're talking about the democratization of previously very capital-intensive equipment. There are now cheap steadycams almost as good as the expensive real thing, follow focus units, and a massively growing segment for cheap cine lenses that are suitable for video work, but don't cost $20-30K a pop like traditional cinema lenses.
We're dramatically lowering the cost of entry for effects that were previously associated with high production value (thin depth of field, follow focus, smooth camera movement, etc).
The entertainment world of the future is a friggin' exciting place.
- chipsy 13y agoWhen I think of budget effects work today, I immediately think of Freddie Wong's stuff. Almost entirely effects-driven web videos.