3 ms·
Yes, it somehow manages to be less verbose than Python, while still being very readable. Sure, you do leave something on the table, but its a fair trade.
by orangethirty 13y ago
Yes, it somehow manages to be less verbose than Python, while still being very readable. Sure, you do leave something on the table, but its a fair trade.
- benhoyt 13y agoLess verbose than Python -- interesting (not that Python is "verbose"!). I've always heard Go was almost as concise as Python, but not quite. Can you give a couple of multi-line Go code examples that are more concise than the equivalent Python?
- nathany 13y agoI found the ability to define a method on a slice/array to be less verbose than the equivalent inherit/delegation setup in Ruby, though I can't speak for Python. http://nathany.com/good http://nathany.com/good I can't imagine a more concise syntax for automatic delegation than Go's embedding.
- coldtea 13y agoIt's not by any means "less verbose than Python". Can you write any program in Go that cannot be written in less lines (often half) in Python?
- orangethirty 13y agoI'm not getting into a language argument. In my project Go has proven less verbose than Python. That's all there is.