3 ms·
You seem to be assuming the direction of causation there. Not that you're wrong, necessarily, but you never can be sure.
by yew 13y ago
You seem to be assuming the direction of causation there. Not that you're wrong, necessarily, but you never can be sure.
- stfu 13y agoWell, it is certainly bi-directional. Probably we can settle for the good old echo-chamber description. :)