3 ms·
If true, why veil it at all? Why not just defund it alone? The government reserves the right to not fund whatever it wants to. This will have an awful lot of co
by bhb916 13y ago
If true, why veil it at all? Why not just defund it alone? The government reserves the right to not fund whatever it wants to. This will have an awful lot of collateral damage. So much so that I doubt the primary motivation was simply defunding climate science.
- vkou 13y agoThe Cons have never been overly concerned about collateral damage. (And have been stung by government-critical environmental findings enough times as-is.) It's a government that's made it explicit that it does not govern on the basis of scientific findings.