No, she carefully constructs her counter arguments so as not to make stupid mistakes like you just did. About women being the "property" of their husbands, tha

No, she carefully constructs her counter arguments so as not to make stupid mistakes like you just did. About women being the "property" of their husbands, that's because the husband was liable for the wife's crimes, due to Coverture, which she covers here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=JHkGZvC0z4I http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=J... About the vote: some men had it, men didn't have it, in Anglo countries. Then it was given to all men as a sop because men could be press-ganged. So going to war and dying in a filthy trench based on some politician's whim became the "price of citizenship". But women got the vote without getting the draft that came with it. Yeah and she covers that here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHvcFzzUues http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHvcFzzUues She's got logic and facts. You've got ... sarcasm and assertions. Good luck with that. Now if you still think men have such a good deal, I suggest you try going through a nasty divorce and then get back to me.