4 ms·
It doesn't really matter how old the use (or in this case, misuse) of the term is. It is still an affront to the way we consider property in all other aspects.
by spacelizard 13y ago
It doesn't really matter how old the use (or in this case, misuse) of the term is. It is still an affront to the way we consider property in all other aspects. Just because they were doing it a long time ago does not make it any less invalid now.
- tzs 13y agoIt is quite consistent with the way we consider property in all other aspects. In law, property is any thing, tangible or intangible whereby a legal relationship between persons and the State enforces a possessory interest or legal title in that thing. It has never been limited to just physical things the way modern revisionists are trying to claim.