3 ms·
>Your marginalizing of CSS-related work says to me that you haven't had to maintain large web apps, where CSS quality is that important. This is my exact point
by wyck 13y ago
>Your marginalizing of CSS-related work says to me that you haven't had to maintain large web apps, where CSS quality is that important.
This is my exact point, I have maintained large web apps that often have budgets and limited resources. I my experience they are always way more important pressing matters (aka actual bugs/features effecting revenue) then CSS semantics. There are companies out there that will of course deem this as important, but in my experience this has been a minority.
Getting bogged down into the semantics of html/css can also be limiting, unless you really enjoy doing it, personally I hate CSS, it's an ends to a means and a bad one at that.
- philipwalton 13y agoYou pretty clearly didn't read the article. Semantics weren't discussed at all. The focus was on making the best of working with a language that has a limited feature set, and learning to reexamine long held best practices.
- wyck 13y agoBy semantic I am referring to the idea of "best method", the just of your article being, name things properly and don't create long nested selectors.