3 ms·

Agree better performing games would have made SL more interesting. But I doubt it would have turned it into a big success. Why go to a place to play games whe

by hkyeti 13y ago

Agree better performing games would have made SL more interesting. But I doubt it would have turned it into a big success. Why go to a place to play games when I can just play the games directly. Personally I think that the "separate games with common avatar and spanning community" is a better way to go. Side note - A couple other players also tried that: Blue Mars had better technology and 3d graphics, and ability to make some pretty impressive games, but it never really caught on, mostly because the virtual world itself never took off and retained the players. Raph Koster's Metaplace tried that approach on the web, building games into an avatar community, and players also didn't really warm to it.

doctorpangloss 13y ago
> Why go to a place to play games when I can just play the games directly. Both StarCrafts and WarCraft 3 had excellent custom game/scenario engines. Three leading game genres, MOBA, Tower Defense and Tug of War, got started as scenarios for these games. There is a lot of demand for a place to play games, especially if the tools are right.
rubinelli 13y ago
> separate games with common avatar and spanning community You described Club Penguin: http://mashable.com/2011/12/13/club-penguin-disney/ http://mashable.com/2011/12/13/club-penguin-disney/ I'm not sure the common avatar is a prequisite, though. Steam doesn't have one, but Valve tries to build its social aspects into the games as deep as possible.
- iosnoob 13y ago
  Good point about Steam. The community part is more important than the visual identity. Actually the avatar as a 2d icon or profile pic could do ok. Like in all the fb games.
azakai 13y ago
> Why go to a place to play games when I can just play the games directly. Any new game will require you to set up a user account, download or install something, learn the controls, and so forth. A game inside of Second Life would decrease each of these problems if not remove them entirely. That's the potential. Yes, it has been tried multiple times (in addition to the ones you mentioned, I founded a startup called Syntensity in that field), and always failed. I think the problem is gaining initial momentum. Second Life had that, no one else did. But Second Life squandered it.

by hkyeti 13y ago

doctorpangloss 13y ago

> Why go to a place to play games when I can just play the games directly. Both StarCrafts and WarCraft 3 had excellent custom game/scenario engines. Three leading game genres, MOBA, Tower Defense and Tug of War, got started as scenarios for these games. There is a lot of demand for a place to play games, especially if the tools are right.

rubinelli 13y ago

> separate games with common avatar and spanning community You described Club Penguin: http://mashable.com/2011/12/13/club-penguin-disney/ http://mashable.com/2011/12/13/club-penguin-disney/ I'm not sure the common avatar is a prequisite, though. Steam doesn't have one, but Valve tries to build its social aspects into the games as deep as possible.

iosnoob 13y ago
Good point about Steam. The community part is more important than the visual identity. Actually the avatar as a 2d icon or profile pic could do ok. Like in all the fb games.

azakai 13y ago

> Why go to a place to play games when I can just play the games directly. Any new game will require you to set up a user account, download or install something, learn the controls, and so forth. A game inside of Second Life would decrease each of these problems if not remove them entirely. That's the potential. Yes, it has been tried multiple times (in addition to the ones you mentioned, I founded a startup called Syntensity in that field), and always failed. I think the problem is gaining initial momentum. Second Life had that, no one else did. But Second Life squandered it.