And here you make one of the same lame moral relativist fallacies to back up your point. Parent: "morals are absolute" You: "no, because lots of people argue

And here you make one of the same lame moral relativist fallacies to back up your point. Parent: "morals are absolute" You: "no, because lots of people argue about it" So, if lots of people argued about whether 1+1=2, does that make it false? Reality isn't consensus based. Plus, disagreeing that morality is objective is incoherent. If it isn't objective, then what's wrong with stating that it is objective?