3 ms·

Mueller wasn't saying that it wasn't done intentionally. He was saying not to assume that its removal had been maliciously hidden.

• deleted 13y ago
  [deleted]
  • claudius 13y ago
    ‘this’ refers to hiding the removal, not the removal itself.
    • Udo 13y ago
      I stand corrected. However, Tobias Wolf shows that it was indeed intentional. Which makes sense to me as an outside observer, because if it wasn't intentional then why close it pertly as WONTFIX, why not just come out and say that this feature was scheduled to be removed?
      • claudius 13y ago
        It is obvious that the removal of the feature was intentional. This easily justifies closing a bug as WONTFIX. Whether or not this was intentionally done in a particularly nasty/hidden way is not obvious, and while the commenter claimed that it was intentional, there is little proof, and even if there was proof, it wouldn’t change anything, hence why he was pointed at the CoC. Am I really defending the GNOME project now? ó.Ò