4 ms·
Given how much damage the pipeline leaks can and have caused to the environment, I think the objections ought to be for both.
by blinkingled 13y ago
Given how much damage the pipeline leaks can and have caused to the environment, I think the objections ought to be for both.
- twoodfin 13y agoSo are you just as interested in shutting down (all?) existing pipelines? If not, what's the distinction?
- eightyone 13y agoThey never suggested that. A simple cost-benefit analysis shows us that this pipeline simply isn't worth it.
- twoodfin 13y agoSo simple it can't be linked to?
- blinkingled 13y agoNot really, just saying that if there are so many leaks causing damages - questioning it is the least that can be done. May be the current capacity is enough and they could do more towards guaranteeing / eliminating leaks before building new ones. I don't know - just think that blindly accepting the leaks seems wrong.