4 ms·
No, the author simply repeated old stuff. If all those 'reasonable' diets worked, the current obesity epidemic would not be in its worst point, as it is. Some
by Shorel 14y ago
No, the author simply repeated old stuff. If all those 'reasonable' diets worked, the current obesity epidemic would not be in its worst point, as it is.
Some evidence about sugar:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBnniua6-oM http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBnniua6-oM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRAwgdvhWHw http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRAwgdvhWHw
http://martin.ankerl.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/trouble_with_fructose_slides.pdf http://martin.ankerl.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/trouble_...
- ska 14y agoThis is what "no real resolution yet" means: every few years we get a pet theory or two. The reason this so easily devolves into a `religious` argument scenario is because the basic science is still too weak. The author did the right thing to stay well shut of all that in this article.
- lmaz3 14y agoI don't think that the videos you posted support your claims, at least not the first one. In the suggested diet, almost 2/3 of the carbohydrates don't come from sugar. From the foods listed, most of these carbohydrates should come from the oats and the rice. In these foods, the carbohydrates come almost exclusively from starch, which the body splits into glucose. And glucose is the ideal power source for your body, as Lustig shows at 44:52 in the first of the youtube videos you linked. Now, about the suggars, at 1:13:55 in the same video, he states that we "should eat our carbohydrates with fibers, and thats why fruits are ok". The diet in the article contains plenty of fibres, so that should be ok.