4 ms·
Great idea. Maybe a quick fix for that, before implementing such a different change, would be to automatically point to the most active fork in project descript
by oelmekki 13y ago
Great idea. Maybe a quick fix for that, before implementing such a different change, would be to automatically point to the most active fork in project description when there hasn't been activity for a while.
Being able to accept in a fork a PR made in upstream would be great, too.
- ewheeler 13y agoAgreed. And this wouldn't have to wait for github to implement. Perhaps its possible to create a webservice that could examine the forks in a network graph to identify the most active fork -- and provide a url for the repository that resolves to this most active fork. Something like bestfork.com/reponame --> github.com/newmaintainer/reponame EDIT to be more precise, my example github link should read github.com/defactomaintainer/reponame
- brendanobrien 13y ago+1 I think many of us would pitch in on a hacked-together version of this just hosted on github. The repo that builds this out could itself be a testing ground for the project.