4 ms·
I think you're misreading the article. The first paragraph describes an incident involving a four-year-old Lulu. It's not very clear when the quoted incident oc
by dubfan 13y ago
I think you're misreading the article. The first paragraph describes an incident involving a four-year-old Lulu. It's not very clear when the quoted incident occurred, but either way the language used in the outburst would almost certainly not be used by a four-year-old in a tantrum and is much more characteristic of an early teen.
- prostoalex 13y agoHer daughter is on very good terms with her, and points out a lot of sentences in her mother's book were intended as dry sarcasm http://www.nypost.com/p/entertainment/why_love_my_strict_chinese_mom_uUvfmLcA5eteY0u2KXt7hM http://www.nypost.com/p/entertainment/why_love_my_strict_chi...
- Klinky 13y agoThat is the older daughter, not the younger daughter who had the outburst.