2 ms·
It's easy to see Home as a failure because Facebook is so huge, but it's an early product. They can't develop all the capabilities to ship a mobile phone witho
by pchristensen 13y ago
It's easy to see Home as a failure because Facebook is so huge, but it's an early product. They can't develop all the capabilities to ship a mobile phone without getting their hands dirty, and Windows and Blackberry are proving that a good mobile OS doesn't mean you have distribution.
They have "Facebook phones" in stores and they didn't have to:
- invest in hardware
- develop a new OS
- fork Android
- bootstrap retail distribution
This approach is eerily like Tesla, where even if your initial product doesn't match your end goal, you have a realistic path from reality to vision.
Remember, when the iPhone came out, it had 2G internet, no copy/paste, no apps, and it cost $600. It wasn't competitive with the phone marketplace (it was better, but sold few absolute units compared to the whole market). But it got better every year, and sales ~doubled every year, and now there's no comparison between an original iPhone and the iPhone 5.
I'm not a FB fan but congrats to them for shipping!
- jonknee 13y ago> This approach is eerily like Tesla, where even if your initial product doesn't match your end goal, you have a realistic path from reality to vision. Except people liked Tesla cars from day 1. People don't seem to like Facebook Home, even when it is free. It's not that they don't like Facbeook (the regular app and the Messenger app are both very popular), it's that they specifically don't like Facebook Home. Update: Look at the reviews / install count and most importantly install trend. Brutal. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.facebook.home https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.facebook.h...