4 ms·
English can be really inconsistent at times: "lose" and "loose" are pronounced exactly the same yet have different meanings. Not to be pedantic, but they are n
by shpxnvz 13y ago
English can be really inconsistent at times: "lose" and "loose" are pronounced exactly the same yet have different meanings.
Not to be pedantic, but they are not pronounced the same in American English.
http://www.englishpage.net/showthread.php?10393-Pronunciation-of-quot-Lose-amp-Loose-quot http://www.englishpage.net/showthread.php?10393-Pronunciatio...
- robomartin 13y agoTrue. Having learned a couple of other languages I can, however, place myself in the shoes of a non-native or less fluent speaker, and, to them, these words sound pretty much the same. It's like me with Chinese, it all sounds the same right now. So, "lose" should really be spelled "looze", "looz" or some variant of that. Writing "lose" and pronouncing it \ˈlüz\ makes as much sense as writing "lost" and pronouncing it \ˈlüzt\.
- wfunction 13y ago> So, "lose" should really be spelled "looze", "looz" or some variant of that. How should "have" be spelled? Haav?