3 ms·
That sound like a not really smart idea. If the product is good enough, ship it, that's the project leader (or whoever is "in charge") job. I don't know what pe
by gclaramunt 18y ago
That sound like a not really smart idea. If the product is good enough, ship it, that's the project leader (or whoever is "in charge") job.
I don't know what perfectionism the post refers, but time spent improving performance, maintainability, etc, is an investment (that may or may not pay). Introducing bugs seems a double whammy: a significant effort must be put at introducing bugs so they're not critical and then fixing them, at least think on the carbon-footprint of that waste!
Besides, any non trivial project had enough bugs/enhancements to keep even the best programmers busy...
- amichail 18y agoYou could have tools that automatically introduce minor bugs. And you would ship with these minor bugs. The idea is to force an environment on your developers where perfectionism is impossible. And so this may have positive mental health benefits.