This is a great issue to highlight. However, I'm unconvinced we need to optimize around creating research that can be reproducible, rather that the process of s

This is a great issue to highlight. However, I'm unconvinced we need to optimize around creating research that can be reproducible, rather that the process of science generates the best possible results. Both the scientific and lay public should read this (appropriately) as: one study does not prove a result, there is an 89% chance that a single research paper is simply wrong. This mentality seems to be the bigger gap, although generating high quality research is a big part of the equation (mostly I think for the wasting of resources to validate, process, and reproduce claims).