4 ms·
I just want to clarify a few things, as it would be charitable to say that there are a few misunderstandings in this thread. I am working on a company that is t
by ihodes 13y ago
I just want to clarify a few things, as it would be charitable to say that there are a few misunderstandings in this thread. I am working on a company that is trying to solve some of these issues; this is a complicated industry that I am still learning much about: hopefully some of what I have learned will be of interest to some of you.
The PPACA (Obamacare) is seeking to address this very issue by changing medical reimbursement form a fee-for-service model (e.g. $40,000 to remove a splinter and $10,000 for blood tests and $5,000 for aspirin) to a capitated payment model with additional incentives for providing good outcomes (providing good service). This means that a caregiving organization would get $N a year to care for you, as a male patient with a heart disease in your mid fifties, with N varying as demographics and conditions change.
This change will necessitate a sea-change in the way doctors and other caregiving organizations will treat their patients. In fact, it will result in the creation of a new type of healthcare organization (accountable care organizations, or ACOs) with the primary purpose of bringing down the costs of healthcare (and improving health outcomes).
This is a paradigm shift in medical practice.
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is spearheading this change; something which would be virtually impossible to do without such a large (read: government) player taking the first move. There are a million problems with CMS and the government in healthcare, but this is one of the greatest things they have ever done.
- euroclydon 13y agoIf ACOs are similar in spirit to corporate wellness programs, I think they are going to take paternalism and nagging to a level we can not even yet imagine. It wasn't long ago that we were talking about the patient who was educated about their condition, but now it seems we're to form major financial engagements with organizations whose central premise is that they care more about our health than we do -- scary!!
- bobbydavid 13y agoTo me, the scarier thought is a new conflict between hospitals and pharma. Currently, drug companies market directly to consumers. consumers ask for drugs from doctors, and get prescriptions health care companies have to pay for. Doctors have no reason to deny patients what they want (and the sexy pharma rep keeps encouraging them too). In the new system, the same "entity" writing the prescription is paying for it, as well as "paying" for the cost of not taking it. I imagine doctors will have an incentive to examine the cost/efficacy of a drug, but pharma will hate that. To get around it, pharma will probably launch marketing saying "if your doctor doesn't give you this drug, shes killing you". ACO's fighting drug companies, using the human psyche as the battleground.
- nijk 13y agoIs Kaiser Permanent like an ACO?