4 ms·
http://ia801700.us.archive.org/20/items/gov.uscourts.cand.265908/gov.uscourts.cand.265908.docket.html http://ia801700.us.archive.org/20/items/gov.uscourts.cand.
by apaprocki 13y ago
http://ia801700.us.archive.org/20/items/gov.uscourts.cand.265908/gov.uscourts.cand.265908.docket.html http://ia801700.us.archive.org/20/items/gov.uscourts.cand.26...
"2013-05-08
Order to Show Cause
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE.
If, by 5/22/2013, an attorney qualified to practice in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California does not appear in this action to represent Plaintiff, the court will dismiss the action without prejudice. No hearing will be held on the order to show cause unless otherwise ordered by the court. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/8/2013. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/8/2013: # (1) Certificate of Service) (ecg, COURT STAFF)."
- dangrossman 13y agoHe has to hire a lawyer or the case won't move forward, because you can't represent yourself when filing as a corporation. We'll find out within 14 days if Greenspan actually intended to take this case to court, or if it's just about the awareness/PR it creates.
- X-Istence 13y agoHe asked the court to waive that requirement ...
- dangrossman 13y agoWhat you're reading above my comment is the response to that request. He has until the 22nd to retain a qualified attorney or the case will be dismissed.