3 ms·

I had a very good mix of science in CEGEP that, say, a software engineer from ETS completely missed. I think that a lot of what you learn in the SE curriculum

by herge 13y ago

I had a very good mix of science in CEGEP that, say, a software engineer from ETS completely missed. I think that a lot of what you learn in the SE curriculum can be learnt (and probably is better learnt) on the job, as opposed to the very theoretical courses in a CS curriculum that a) cannot be learnt easily by one's self or on the job and b) will last a lifetime. In 2006-7, it would have been much more useful nowadays for someone to learn about machine learning in an AI class than about rational rose and the waterfall process, and I suspect the same applies now in the CS vs SE debate, except with updated technologies.

jplmelanson 13y ago
You obvisouly don't know what is taught in SE. Let's take McGill as an example (from http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/academic/undergrad/programs/science-majors http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/academic/undergrad/programs/science-...) CS: This program is the standard Major program offered by the School of Computer Science. It provides a broad introduction to the principles of computer science and offers ample opportunity to acquire in-depth knowledge of several sub-disciplines. At the same time, its credit requirements allow students to take an additional minor. SE: This program provides a broad introduction to the principles of computer science and covers in depth the design and development of software systems. For example, I recall that my SE program had some common courses with other engineering branches (ethics and technology, entrepreneurship, communication, finances for project manager), which were common to all engineering disciplines.