I think your summation of this article is way off. First - It was written by a lone PHd over a year before the NIMH blog post (which was written by a lone MD).

I think your summation of this article is way off. First - It was written by a lone PHd over a year before the NIMH blog post (which was written by a lone MD). Second - I don't think this author was presenting his article as "the last word". Lastly - The speculation on Einstein is grounded in comments by one of Einstein's biographers. I wouldn't call that groundless.