4 ms·
So is this to imply that we should stop doing things that benefit the planet and the human species if we believe it will have a negative economic impact? Obvio
by ryguytilidie 13y ago
So is this to imply that we should stop doing things that benefit the planet and the human species if we believe it will have a negative economic impact? Obviously I'm not arguing KP should be the ones doing this, but your point seems to imply that these actions are only rational if the market supports them and you make a profit.
- drumdance 13y agoI said it's a rational policy response. But it's not a rational market response in the current environment. KP is a market actor that was betting on the viability of that market. So far it's not working. There are other ways and means to effect change besides the marketplace. I never said anything about stopping "doing things that benefit the planet."