I only see two posts about this on the front page. One is from torrentfreak, with obvious bias. The other (this one) is NYTimes. Both say that they were found g

I only see two posts about this on the front page. One is from torrentfreak, with obvious bias. The other (this one) is NYTimes. Both say that they were found guilty of violated copyright, sentenced to a year in prison and fined millions. While I agree that we probably only need one story about this, I don't think two is really worth complaining about. This is truly a landmark case about a topic which is definitely of critical interest to many hackers here.