3 ms·
PS: I'm glad the site works fine without Javascript enabled. Who does this and why? Do you like browsing the web where 80% of website's functionality is broken
by fotoblur 13y ago
PS: I'm glad the site works fine without Javascript enabled.
Who does this and why? Do you like browsing the web where 80% of website's functionality is broken because you think its a good idea to browse with JavaScript disabled. Makes no sense.
- uncoder0 13y agoMostly for this https://panopticlick.eff.org/ https://panopticlick.eff.org/ 18.28 (nojs) vs 21.45 (w/js) bits of identifying information using Chrome.
- jabbernotty 13y ago> Who does this and why? I'm one of them. I do this because of malicious adverts and because of tracking systems. These cost privacy, but also real money (a well-publicized exampple is ordering airline tickets) > Do you like browsing the web where 80% of website's functionality is broken because you think its a good idea to browse with JavaScript disabled. Makes no sense. I agree, it wouldn't make sense if people liked broken websites, and I'm pretty sure that they don't. But I think what you mean is that I should enable JS because it is in wide use. For me, that is not a good enough reason. As a former web application developer, I do believe that most of those websites could do fine without JS!
- jabbernotty 13y agoWith 'malicious adverts' I mean malware being spread via advertisement systems. These tend to use JS, Flash, Java and such.