3 ms·
I can't wait for end-to-end encryption to become more mainstream. What would happen if Apple or Samsung started selling cell phones that encrypted voice commun
by RKearney 13y ago
I can't wait for end-to-end encryption to become more mainstream.
What would happen if Apple or Samsung started selling cell phones that encrypted voice communications end-to-end and prevented any kind of intercepting? Would the government just ban them?
- nsxwolf 13y agoYes. Remember Clipper chip?
- tsotha 13y agoAnd remember how it failed? The only way the government is going to be able to snoop in on everyone's traffic is to make the use of cryptography illegal. I don't see how that can work, either, since it's sort of necessary for commercial transactions.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- RKearney 13y agoWell the downside to iMessage is all of your messages are stored on Apples servers, waiting to be given to authorities at the drop of a warrant. When I said end-to-end encryption, I was thinking more along the lines of the middle man (Apple) not having the ability to decrypt your messages.
- moxie 13y agoWe're working on open source mobile end-to-end encryption at Open Whisper Systems: http://www.whispersystems.org http://www.whispersystems.org We'd love it if more interested folks got involved.
- andyjohnson0 13y agohttp://www.redactapp.com/ http://www.redactapp.com/ "Using encryption, ciphers and peer to peer messaging, Redact sends heavily encrypted messages from one phone to another without passing through any central servers. Messages you have sent or received can be redacted from both handsets at the touch of a button with no method of recovery."
- JshWright 13y agoWhere's the source?
- andyjohnson0 13y agoFor what? The application? The underlying OS? The vhdl for the CPU? What do you want to distrust first?