3 ms·
It's a conflict between the Syrian government forces and several militias of (mostly) Syrians. So it's a civil war. Yeah, some of the militias aren't intereste
by nandemo 13y ago
It's a conflict between the Syrian government forces and several militias of (mostly) Syrians. So it's a civil war.
Yeah, some of the militias aren't interested in democracy, and some are funded by external powers that have various interests in Syria. It's still a civil war.
- oakaz 13y agoIt is definitely not. As you can see the prove in my other comments, Free Syrian Army was established by a NATO sponsored Libyan terrorist. As you can see in their videos, these fucking terrorists don't even speak the Syrian dialect of Arabic. We are talking about a global terrorist organization and huge manipulations made by NATO countries to legalize this terrorism. Please go to do some research.
- katbyte 13y agoAt what point does it go from terrorism to a civil war? I'm not saying syria is or isn't one, but you got me thinking about how a civil war could very well be labeled terrorism and vice versa depending on the spin you wanted to put on it.
- kmcd 13y ago> several militias of (mostly) Syrians. So it's a civil war. Incorrect: this is an external destablisation by NATO, Qatar et al. & a heroic defence by the Syrian people. Who is training, funding & supporting the death squads in Syria? NATO, under the supervision of Robert Stephen Ford: http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-salvador-option-for-syria-us-nato-sponsored-death-squads-integrate-opposition-forces/31096 http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-salvador-option-for-syria-u... Negroponte/Ford were resposible for running the death squads in central America in the 80's & Iraq in 2004 onwards. If Mexico & Canada were sending snipers to the US & some libertarians joined in - would you call that a civil war?