4 ms·
That's a rather low bar, don't you think? Haskell/ML family languages had all that and more.
by balakk 13y ago
That's a rather low bar, don't you think? Haskell/ML family languages had all that and more.
- kevingadd 13y agoHaskell/ML families bear only the slightest similarity to C#. Saying 'Haskell has a REPL, so why doesn't C#' is like saying 'C and GLSL both have structs, so why doesn't C run on my GPU?'* Furthermore, like I said in another comment, a C# REPL in that era would have been nearly unusable. The language is not designed for incremental authoring or compilation. * CUDA notwithstanding
- pjmlp 13y agoIt is a matter of implementation, it has nothing to do with the language per se.