I also looked at the Redwood City data point and it's pretty clear that they are using incorrect data. Since I have been to Redwood City and am going to be livi

I also looked at the Redwood City data point and it's pretty clear that they are using incorrect data. Since I have been to Redwood City and am going to be living there permanently starting a few months from now, I was a little confused. Using this tool on ArcGIS [1] I was not able to find a single corridor that has such a low median household income anywhere near Redwood City. Note that they don't seem to use the most granular data level, but zoomed out I get the number as $45,568 for tract #060816102.02 as opposed to their $30,800. $45k is still low compared to the surrounding areas, but it's far away from $30k. [1] http://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?services=da76de09076b4959ad005e1dc2c48049 http://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?services=da76d...