3 ms·
No, that's not what I meant, sorry. :) I was curious why you replied to me specifically, even though my point was so obviously not related to yours (and in som
by Udo 14y ago
No, that's not what I meant, sorry. :)
I was curious why you replied to me specifically, even though my point was so obviously not related to yours (and in some ways directly opposed to it). In some way it felt like I was declaring "X, not Y!" and you replied with "I solved for Y with Z, it's awesome!".