3 ms·
My hope is that this will play out in the same way as the RIAA law suits: Since law suits are expensive, they have to ask for 5K+ at a minimum in each law suit
by drcode 14y ago
My hope is that this will play out in the same way as the RIAA law suits:
Since law suits are expensive, they have to ask for 5K+ at a minimum in each law suit (or if they do criminal suits, 6 months plus of jail time)
However, the only people they can charge are P2P participants, so in the case of bitcoin, mainly a bunch of college students trying to be entrepreneurial. (Charging exchanges is another issue... in this post I'm talking about trying to directly go after the core bitcoin system.)
Charging a bunch of nice college kids with 6 months jail time for buying a bitcoin is the worst PR disaster imaginable. So I'm hoping this kind of crackdown is untenable, from a political standpoint, and that bitcoins remain effectively unregulated.
- iaw 14y agoThis is the US Government, not the RIAA. The US Government is not motivated by profit but limited by budgetary constraints. It would not be implausible for the US govt to monitor packets for the BTC protocol and start tying transactions/wallets to IP addresses. At that point have the local PD walk around issuing citations and then go after the big fish with lawyers. Also, who cares about PR here? No one running the crackdown would actually be an elected official, they'd all be appointed...
- drcode 14y agoYou make some good points.