3 ms·
@1: In a normal restaurant, not every employer handles food all the time. I don’t see why a (helpful) license shouldn’t be required – whether the actual license
by claudius 13y ago
@1: In a normal restaurant, not every employer handles food all the time. I don’t see why a (helpful) license shouldn’t be required – whether the actual licenses are a positive contribution to public health is another issue.
@2: If it is not legal to park somewhere, then don’t park there rather than complaining about unpredictability in law enforcement. Ideally, everyone parking ideally would be fined every time. Would your friend prefer that?
@3: Nothing wrong with enforcement of health regulations. Ideally, these would take place all the time at the best humanly possible quality. Since health inspectors are just humans, too, they might appear somewhat arbitrary. Again, ideally, everyone violating one of these regulations at any time would be shut down permanently.
@4,5: Okay, these are obviously problems. The simplest solution appears to be not to require a license to operate such a business and regularly auction off suitable (public) places to the highest bidders (once a month, maybe?).
- greedo 13y agoRegarding #1- I worked in food service for 17 years, opened my own restaurant, etc. ALL my employees had to have a food handler's permit, and there had to be a manager with an expanded permit. So the idea that only one person needs a permit in an entire restaurant is scary. Perhaps it's a terminology issue...