It's not uncommon, for example here's a recent double-entendre ruling about a strip club: http://www.woai.com/media/lib/12/5/9/5/59511ba8-415b-4b2e-a783-cc15b6

It's not uncommon, for example here's a recent double-entendre ruling about a strip club: http://www.woai.com/media/lib/12/5/9/5/59511ba8-415b-4b2e-a783-cc15b6c19cc0/Itsy_Bitsy_Teeny_Weeny_Bikini_Top_Order.pdf http://www.woai.com/media/lib/12/5/9/5/59511ba8-415b-4b2e-a7... The lawyers out there speculated he did it as yet another smack down to Prenda law. This will always be known in law circles as the "Star Trek Order". It'll be more widely read, and the shame will always follow them. His findings of law are correct, a little toying with them outside of his findings is quite enjoyable.