2 ms·
A judge is not a free agent; they can only rule on the cases they're assigned. Moreover, what got this judge's goat was specifically "the illegal parts" of wha
by rst 13y ago
A judge is not a free agent; they can only rule on the cases they're assigned.
Moreover, what got this judge's goat was specifically "the illegal parts" of what Prenda was doing, most notably repeatedly lying in court. It wasn't the tangled ownership structure (a feature they share with some of the trolls in the news, like, say, Lodsys), but specific lies they told about it.
(The reason the ownership mattered in the Prenda case is that the lawyers and the owners were one and the same, which is against some court rules. Whoever owns Lodsys, it's pretty clearly not the attorneys representing them in court. And the lies about the ownership structure were not necessarily the most extravagant or significant --- Judge Wright also has a lot to say about misrepresentations of evidence, etc.)