3 ms·
"We spoke to OTOY, and the company told us it has no immediate, specific plans to publish it openly. That's not to say that the company is necessarily opposed t
by leeoniya 14y ago
"We spoke to OTOY, and the company told us it has no immediate, specific plans to publish it openly. That's not to say that the company is necessarily opposed to doing so; rather, it's not sure how to do without undermining its commercial products."
ah, thats why i couldnt find it on github. and oh :(
- randyrand 14y agoIf it is decoded in Javascript on the browser (so... source code), can't we figure out how to decode and encode the codec fairly easily? Or would using the codec still be a copyright violation even if it is reverse engineered?
- battwell 14y agoMinified js isn't much easier to reverse engineer than compiled native code.
- daeken 14y agoI've spent most of my life reversing native code, and I've also reversed a good deal of minified JS. The latter is many, many orders of magnitude easier and less time-intensive in every case. Now, with things like Emscripten and Asm.js that will change (since the JS is effectively compiled native code), but it still will be easier due to the fact that, for example, you don't have to worry about code-data separations you have to worry about in most native code.
- leeoniya 14y agothe whole point is to have an open codec. if you have to reverse it, not only are you breaking the ToS/EULA, but you're much better off just using a natively installed codec.