3 ms·
I know that bashing Heroku is popular this days but seriously i don't like what you did. I'm not a fan of your way of getting users by pointing some non-object
by Goranek 13y ago
I know that bashing Heroku is popular this days but seriously i don't like what you did.
I'm not a fan of your way of getting users by pointing some non-objective figures and saying hey we're faster & better than the competition.
Seriously, you should benchmark and say "we can do this, this and this", and let your users decide if you're faster, better.. because doing it in your way, is just ugly and not fair.
Btw, I like your design.
You mention redis on your site, but there is no redis in the pricing.
- Kequc 13y agoI like it. They offered way more information to us than the route you are suggesting and opened themselves up to more internet scrutiny as a result. I know that "Shelly is faster than Heroku says Shelly." isn't the first thing you want to hear but they offered a comparison in key areas that I find interesting. What if they just took all the numbers that Heroku offered, then offered their numbers in all of those areas. That is essentially what has happened but we don't need to compile both sets together ourselves because it was already paid for someone to do it. Arguably Shelly offering numbers that could be compared with Heroku's numbers would be nearly the same thing but less convenient.
- grk 13y agoTo run redis, you only need to pay for the virtual server and storage, that's why it's not mentioned separately in pricing. You can run all non-replicated databases (postgres, mongodb and redis) this way.