4 ms·
Somewhat makes sense to me. I haven't used Fireworks in a long time and I'm not a designer, but it seemed like it was a user friendly hybrid of Photoshop (for r
by gexla 13y ago
Somewhat makes sense to me. I haven't used Fireworks in a long time and I'm not a designer, but it seemed like it was a user friendly hybrid of Photoshop (for raster) and Illustrator (for vector.) It seemed that together Photoshop and Illustrator could do everything you needed for the web, but that required a lot bigger payment, a lot of controls you didn't use, another software program and there were some minor things that weren't quite as smooth for web (aside from the UI.) I'm surprised Fireworks has lasted this long.