3 ms·
>remember they came at him with helicopters and automatic weapons That was the New Zealand police, not the fucking FBI. Why is there no outrage at the governme
by youngerdryas 13y ago
>remember they came at him with helicopters and automatic weapons
That was the New Zealand police, not the fucking FBI. Why is there no outrage at the government that actually arrested him? Was the minister held at gunpoint? If you read torrent freak you probably think so.
- rbanffy 13y ago> Why is there no outrage at the government that actually arrested him? http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/09/27/new_zealand_kim_dotcom_apology/ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/09/27/new_zealand_kim_dotc... and http://abovethelaw.com/2012/09/megameltdown-new-zealands-prime-minister-apologizes-to-kim-dotcom/ http://abovethelaw.com/2012/09/megameltdown-new-zealands-pri... "If they had been more thorough in what they had done, they would have worked out that Mr. Dotcom had a residence class visa, and therefore was protected by the law," "Frankly, I’m pretty appalled by what I’ve seen because these are basic errors." "This is really a matter of mistake and human error, not one of a great conspiracy," "the agency has let itself down very badly."
- vorg 13y ago> That was the New Zealand police, not the fucking FBI The attack against Kim Dotcom cascaded through many intermediaries. Although the NZ police were performing the raid, the FBI were observing and involved in the planning. Their involvement and NZ govt approval were commissioned (deniably, of course) by US politicians such as Joe Biden, ultimately sourcing back to big money in Hollywood. I'm also the subject of that type of cascading attack, sourcing back to someone in Silicon Valley (http://groovy.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=Blog04#8 http://groovy.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=Blog04#8).