I'm not arguing that this article contains factually incorrect information. I am arguing that the tail is attempting to wag the dog. We know that Murdoch exer

I'm not arguing that this article contains factually incorrect information. I am arguing that the tail is attempting to wag the dog. We know that Murdoch exercises editorial control at the WSJ even though he was originally forbidden from doing so in the original purchase agreement of the WSJ. So I stand by my point that this is not journalism but instead propoganda written for sole purpose of influencing public opinion for the sake of those with a vested interest in California oil drilling. This is not the 'Opinion' of some editor at the WSJ. This is the 'Opinion' of News Corporation and their board. The fact that this article is presented as the 'Opinion' of the WSJ editorial board is misrepresentation. That's why I argue that this is not journalism.