> Who calls it the "psychiatric bible" other than well-biased Scientologists who want to replace it with their own "religious technology"? A number of people,

> Who calls it the "psychiatric bible" other than well-biased Scientologists who want to replace it with their own "religious technology"? A number of people, actually: http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2012/12/18/daily-circuit-dsm-changes http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2012/12/18/dail... http://healthworkscollective.com/michaeldouglas1/98946/government-institute-announces-distancing-psychiatric-bible http://healthworkscollective.com/michaeldouglas1/98946/gover... http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-204_162-6193716.html http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-204_162-6193716.html http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=dsm-5-update http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=dsm-5-updat... http://www.theglobeandmail.com/commentary/editorials/new-psychiatric-bible-expands-mental-disorders/article545750/ http://www.theglobeandmail.com/commentary/editorials/new-psy... http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/200906/the-psychiatric-bible-manual-manipulation http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/200906/the-psychiatr...