3 ms·
This suggestion is rather naive and impractical. Most people do know JS. It's a rather painful way to develop reasonable UIs. Not even jQuery is abstracting eno
by cpg 13y ago
This suggestion is rather naive and impractical. Most people do know JS. It's a rather painful way to develop reasonable UIs. Not even jQuery is abstracting enough these days (for this kind of work).
Please make useful suggestions and cut down on specious remarks. RJS is not in use for a long time. This article did not even merit the first page, except it's a slow weekend.
- homakov 13y agoyour first question looked like "if not RJS then what". Now i just don't understand what are you talking about, what "interactive" is for you.
- cpg 13y agoOh, so if not raw JS, you don't "understand" what other possible libraries might be use to design modern usable intractive web apps? Way to go downvoting for that, too - shows real depth. I shall not try make you "understand" the existence of this fast-expanding space.