4 ms·

Did a little Googling about issue #1, found this great response taking it apart: http://eastasiastudent.net/china/edge-org-chinese-eugenics-rubbish/ http://east

• isaacn 13y ago
  Thanks for finding that link to the rebuttal. The original article certainly was sensationalizing every little point.
• deleted 13y ago
  [deleted]
• spitx 13y ago
  The critique is really porous and rife with contradictions. I won't even bother paring them down. One example: The other thing that Miller totally glosses over (or is just ignorant of) is that the one-child policy is a) very badly implemented in many places and b) has had all sorts of terrible side-effects (other than the top-heavy population issue). The first point is that the one-child policy is not evenly implemented, and is very vulnerable to corruption, loop-holes, mismanagement etc. etc. "Very badly implemented" or implemented to allow for exceptions to the elites and the affluent, who can pay a nominal fee, for their multiple child transgressions.