3 ms·
Providing them with individual versions that they configured isn't a problem at all, even on a per-directory basis. You can do that with Apache and some configu
by _ak 13y ago
Providing them with individual versions that they configured isn't a problem at all, even on a per-directory basis. You can do that with Apache and some configuration.
The actual problem is more complex: you always have the conflict between wanting users to use the latest version (because of security issues or stuff like that) and not breaking the software they're running.
- grobmeier 13y agoActually 1and1 is running 5.2. Some web software does meanwhile requires 5.3. After all software will break even when there is no upgrade at all. Anyway, i fully agree: providing hosting is a hard business. Imaging what 1and1 needs to do for this huge server farm... wow. It's ok for a lot of low traffic sites without much functionality, but in my case I needed more at one point. Now I have the choice between 5.3 and 5.4. Thats neat.