3 ms·
> sadly, this doesn't seem to support any sort of multithreading Maybe multithreading is just not yet implemented? > So that kills one of the main reasons to
by uvtc 13y ago
> sadly, this doesn't seem to support any sort of multithreading
Maybe multithreading is just not yet implemented?
> So that kills one of the main reasons to use Clojure in the first place.
I could see ClojureC being very useful for when you want:
* small footprint
* easy C-library interop
* fast start-up time
and where you don't necessarily need multithreading.
(BTW, I'd be curious to hear what you think might be the differences in use cases between ClojureC and mjolnir/clojure-metal.)