Your right, I probably shouldn't be so quick to call someone a crackpot. But still, unless I'm very much mistaken all he's doing is done is to expand the defin

Your right, I probably shouldn't be so quick to call someone a crackpot. But still, unless I'm very much mistaken all he's doing is done is to expand the definition of "able to compute a function" to include "able to run fast enough to gather the input data for a function". That might be a useful definition for some things but to use that to claim that "Turing was wrong"?