3 ms·
Sadly the link to the followup (http://www.evilsoapbox.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=1612 http://www.evilsoapbox.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=1612) fails with a data
by mikro2nd 14y ago
Sadly the link to the followup (http://www.evilsoapbox.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=1612 http://www.evilsoapbox.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=1612) fails with a database authentication error.
- ck2 14y agoHere you go: http://www.chimerasaurus.com/2013/02/raspberry-pi-vs-aws-v2-0/ http://www.chimerasaurus.com/2013/02/raspberry-pi-vs-aws-v2-... The dynamic link, ie. ?p=1234 has to be served dynamically but the static slug can be served by supercache or similar. What I find far more fascinating: EXT3: 329.83 requests/sec EXT4: 484.27 requests/sec ext4 is 30% faster than ext3? Really? What's going on there...
- itry 14y agoStrange indeed. Why is the disk accessed in the first place? For a site like this, I would expect all content to be cached in ram all the time.
- benmccann 14y agoYour math is a bit off. I think you mean 46% faster. That is surprising if consistently reproducible.
- snaky 14y agoThere is no meaningful data to confirm this, to say the least. http://dtrace.org/blogs/brendan/2012/10/23/active-benchmarking/ http://dtrace.org/blogs/brendan/2012/10/23/active-benchmarki...