4 ms·
> meaning there were no serious mirroring efforts Unfortunately, this is also the case for the majority of commercially-published science. And no, JSTOR is not
by kanzure 14y ago
> meaning there were no serious mirroring efforts
Unfortunately, this is also the case for the majority of commercially-published science. And no, JSTOR is not a good response because JSTOR doesn't even begin to scratch the surface of science. Science is one of the most important efforts in human history, and we don't have backups, or even mirrors. Great.
Edit: does anyone know some orgs with deep pockets that would be willing to accept and host 30-50 terabytes of papers? I can't seem to find anyone that doesn't wuss out. I know it's risky, but it's also critically important.
- wisty 14y ago> Does anyone know some orgs with deep pockets that would be willing to accept and host 30-50 terabytes of papers? The Pirate Bay?
- kanzure 14y ago> The Pirate Bay? Sorry, but TPB doesn't actually host any content.
- maaku 14y agoYes, but if you threw a torrent up with every published paper since Galileo, there'd be be plenty of people willing to seed.
- Oxxide 14y agothat means someone has to download it, though.
- rosstafarian 14y agoI believe some one already tried something similar, it unfortunately didn't end well[0]. If some one does throw up such a torrent though I'd be glad to help seed. [0]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz
- jlgreco 14y agoHad Aaron successfully seeded it a few times (if indeed that was even his intention in the first place), not really much would have changed for him. However I am certain that we would have the entirety of what he seeded.
- kanzure 14y ago> However I am certain that we would have the entirety of what he seeded. You guys are all crazy.. torrents consisting of this type of content already exist, and they have only one seeder. For example, the excellent Library Genesis collection. Why should I believe you when you tell me countless people will come to the rescue this time? Your average seeder doesn't have piles of terabytes, and evidently doesn't care to seed one or two parts out of thousands.
- jlgreco 14y agoPeople hoard all sorts of data, if they are made aware of it and want it. I for one certainly would have seeded the dump Aaron made, had he seeded it himself first. And who doesn't have piles of terabytes these days? What is your objective, give it to people that don't want it, or make it available to people that do? The later is not rocket science, the former impossible and pointless. If you are telling me that nobody is interested in your content then I am not going to argue with you... If people are interested in having your content then the only thing standing in their way is your weird objection to attempting to distribute it. If I am so wrong, so what? Nothing ventured, nothing gained.
- kanzure 14y ago> the only thing standing in their way is your weird objection > to attempting to distribute it. My point was that people are already trying to host this sort of science content over torrents and it's not working. Nobody seeds it. I gave a very specific example to confirm this observation. I would love to hear about possible alternatives.
- wisty 14y agoNo, but it allows the costs of hosting to be shared amongst the people who want a mirror.
- pm90 14y agodoes anyone know some orgs with deep pockets that would be willing to accept and host 30-50 terabytes of papers? I can't seem to find anyone that doesn't wuss out. I know it's risky, but it's also critically important. Google?
- hkmurakami 14y agoArchive.org? (though this doesn't 100% match their mission)
- jacquesm 14y agoHey Kanzure, mail me please. Jacques