5 ms·
Coinlab released statement on their site about the suit. http://coinlab.com/status-5-2 http://coinlab.com/status-5-2 Full text: I have more news on the Mt. G
by oscilloscope 13y ago
Coinlab released statement on their site about the suit.
http://coinlab.com/status-5-2 http://coinlab.com/status-5-2
Full text:
I have more news on the Mt. Gox transition. Today, CoinLab regretfully filed a formal complaint in Federal Court against Mt. Gox.
In the last month, many of you have contacted me directly and asked for more details on our transition, and I would say (charitably) that I've been frustratingly vague -- I just haven't been able to talk about it.
I'm going to take this chance to talk about it. I'm not here to complain, our filing contains and accurate summary of events, but I want to talk about what I see as most important for Bitcoin right now.
Bitcoiners have, on average, lost more money due to technology difficulties, frozen / lost banking relationships and shady characters like pirateat40 than due to any part of Bitcoin's fundamental economics. I hate this fact, passionately. I have a vision in which high quality service and technology and ethics can be delivered to you, me, my kids, everyone who has a stake in Bitcoin.
It is my goal for CoinLab that we provide fundamental infrastructure to minimize these risks for everyone in our space, and I do mean everyone; from those on the Bitcoin Forums who dislike and distrust me personally, to the mom and pop cupcake makers in San Francisco, to my daughter who recently sold some knit products for .01BTC.
While I was willing to take a two year restriction on our venue (US and Canada only for two years was part of our contract), I have for a number of years now wanted to make sure that Bitcoin is properly situated for everyone's good.
When we spun up our initial alpha customers, they included companies that from one perspective could reasonably be deemed to be our competitors, some of the best companies in our space. We worked extremely hard to provide them great service, because I want to build our ecosystem; I want a robust economy and a broad base of service and product for everyone.
What tipped us into filing was our complete inability to get Mt. Gox to deliver on the few simple things left that were needed for customers to move over en-masse; we were often left just apologizing to our alpha customers while their own businesses suffered. I'm just not willing to put any of our customers in that position -- if we can't do a good job for you, I won't promise that we can.
What I hope is that Mt. Gox has this same interest in the good of Bitcoin, and Bitcoiners, and finds a way to work this out.
So, what's next? I hope that we'll be able to provide some good news on that front soon, from a financing and technology perspective at the very least, and ideally with news that we've settled this dispute. In the interim, my biggest hope is that Mt. Gox does an excellent job keeping Bitcoiners safe and liquid and trading on the exchange.
Peter Vessenes
- milkshakes 13y ago"for the sake of bitcoin" mt gox, a japanese company running an anonymous currency exchange should hand over full account, holdings, and trade details of all of their north american customers to a company under US jurisdiction? how does that make sense?
- kevingadd 13y agoWell, Mt. Gox agreed to do it, and given that they've repeatedly demonstrated their complete inability to operate a functioning exchange, you certainly couldn't do any worse by handing their customers over to Coinlab.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- bionsuba 13y agoThey crash when people start to do high volume trading, which is the cause of these recent bubbles because the crashes lead to panics.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- fnordfnordfnord 13y ago* The lag was hardly a factor influencing how people were trading.* Absolutely untrue, the lag was in the thousands of seconds and only increasing. Then they halted trading. Gox has persistent problems with high trading volume. This is widely known.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]