>[Google has] kind of abbonned JS in favor of Dart Where did you get that idea? Just look at these graphs: http://www.dartlang.org/performance/ http://www.dar

>[Google has] kind of abbonned JS in favor of Dart Where did you get that idea? Just look at these graphs: http://www.dartlang.org/performance/ http://www.dartlang.org/performance/ Apparently, they are still trying to make V8 faster. V8's graph isn't flat and there are also very recent bumps. >As oppossed to supporting asm.js Asm.js is about JavaScript the compiler target, not JavaScript itself. Using asm.js means writing code in C/C++ (or something similar), which means it's more comparable to PNaCl than Dart.