3 ms·
According to the AngularJS Developer Guide [1]: «Angular was built for the CRUD application in mind. (...) Games, and GUI editors are examples of very intensiv
by vanni 13y ago
According to the AngularJS Developer Guide [1]:
«Angular was built for the CRUD application in mind. (...) Games, and GUI editors are examples of very intensive and tricky DOM manipulation. These kinds of apps are different from CRUD apps, and as a result are not a good fit for Angular. In these cases using something closer to bare metal such as jQuery may be a better fit.»
[1] http://docs.angularjs.org/guide/overview#angularsweetspot http://docs.angularjs.org/guide/overview#angularsweetspot
- modarts 13y agoI'd think Backbone plus jQuery makes more sense if you need close to the metal interaction, but still need some level of structure.
- zeeg 13y agoWhat is "close to the metal interaction" when you're talking about set of frameworks that run in an embedded interpreter that runs in a browser that runs on a GUI that runs on an OS that runs on.. oh wait.
- KaoruAoiShiho 13y agoI think you're missing the point of the question.
- vanni 13y agoI don't think so. It seems to me that the main question was: if I am already using AngularJS to develop a web page/app, is it better to develop every needed self-contained component in AngularJS or can I mix JQuery-only components with AngularJS-based code? So my answer, citing the official AngularJS documentation, was: no problem mixing AngularJS and JQuery, but some self-contained components ‒ such as a WYSIWYG editor ‒ maybe don't fit well with the AngularJS architecture. If you think that I'm missing the point yet, would you mind to elaborate on that? Thanks.